Mmcp.market

Head to head

Iceberg MCP Server vs SSH — policy-gated remote access

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Iceberg MCP Serverio.github.dragonejt/iceberg-mcp-server
C
No reviews yet

MCP Server for Apache Iceberg

Full listing
SSH — policy-gated remote accessio.github.tufantunc/ssh-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Policy-gated, audited SSH for Linux and Windows hosts: roles, approvals, and an audit log.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SSH — policy-gated remote access (83/100 against 65). SSH — policy-gated remote access has noticeably more public adoption.

 Iceberg MCP ServerSSH — policy-gated remote access
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC65/100B83/100
Adoption—Established
GitHub stars–745
Downloads / week–9.3k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release—2026-09-17
CategoryEverything elseEverything else

Other comparisons

Iceberg MCP Server vs Azure MCP ServerIceberg MCP Server vs SemioticIceberg MCP Server vs World MonitorIceberg MCP Server vs NetdataIceberg MCP Server vs Microsoft 365 MCP ServerAll Everything else servers