Head to head
mcp-openshift vs homebutler
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
mcp-openshift
Bio.github.dockndevai/mcp-openshiftNo reviews yet
Safe-by-default MCP for OpenShift / Kubernetes: projects, pods, logs, deployments, routes.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Tells an agent what changed on a server since it last looked - status, Docker, backups, Proxmox.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp-openshift (80/100 against 58). homebutler has noticeably more public adoption.
| mcp-openshift | homebutler | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | C58/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 287 |
| Downloads / week | – | 1.3k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |