Head to head
kubernetes-mcp-server vs mcp-openshift
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
mcp-openshift
Bio.github.dockndevai/mcp-openshiftNo reviews yet
Safe-by-default MCP for OpenShift / Kubernetes: projects, pods, logs, deployments, routes.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours kubernetes-mcp-server (94/100 against 80). kubernetes-mcp-server has noticeably more public adoption.
| kubernetes-mcp-server | mcp-openshift | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A94/100 | B80/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 2.1k | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 8.3k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |