Head to head
Groundhog vs Apple Contacts
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Groundhog
Aio.github.dmytrome/groundhog-mcpNo reviews yet
Search, read and research the web, with hidden text stripped by default and sources hashed
Full listing
No reviews yet
Search and read Apple Contacts — resolves numbers and emails to names, writes off by default
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 92 out of 100).
| Groundhog | Apple Contacts | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 3 |
| Downloads / week | 203 | 383 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 7 |
| Write actions | — | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |