Head to head
Engraphy vs Cost Guard MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Self-hosted MCP memory server: a typed knowledge graph on Postgres 16 and pgvector.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Pre-flight query cost and result-size guardrails for AI agents on BigQuery, Snowflake, Databricks
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Cost Guard MCP (82/100 against 73).
| Engraphy | Cost Guard MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B73/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | New | New |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |