Mmcp.market

Head to head

Engraphy vs GeoLens

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Engraphyio.github.devon-clarkk/engraphy
B
No reviews yet

Self-hosted MCP memory server: a typed knowledge graph on Postgres 16 and pgvector.

Full listing
GeoLensio.github.geolens-io/geolens
B
No reviews yet

Read-only access to a self-hosted GeoLens spatial catalog: datasets, features, maps, sandboxed SQL.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours GeoLens (82/100 against 73). GeoLens has noticeably more public adoption.

 EngraphyGeoLens
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB73/100B82/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars1248
Downloads / week–320
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceNOASSERTIONApache-2.0
Last release2026-09-182026-09-18
CategoryDatabasesDatabases

Other comparisons

Engraphy vs SupabaseEngraphy vs MCP Toolbox for DatabasesEngraphy vs NeonEngraphy vs Magic CloudEngraphy vs PostgreSQL MCP ServerAll Databases servers