Head to head
x402 Trinity vs Edgehound
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
x402 Trinity
Aio.github.devmster/x402-trinityNo reviews yet
Give an agent a wallet. Pays for x402 resources within hard limits. Base + USDC, gasless.
Full listingEdgehound
Aio.github.Energixe/edgehound-mcpNo reviews yet
Writes adversarial test suites for AI-built code. Your agent's test engineer.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Edgehound (97/100 against 86). Edgehound is hosted and callable through the gateway; x402 Trinity runs on your own machine.
| x402 Trinity | Edgehound | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | A97/100 |
| Adoption | — | — |
| GitHub stars | – | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | — |
| Last release | — | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |