Mmcp.market

Head to head

MCP vs Numguard

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

MCPcom.decionis/mcp
A
No reviews yet

Authorize consequential AI agent actions before execution

Full listing
Numguardio.github.ipezygj/numguard
C
No reviews yet

Verify a number before an agent asserts it — evals, backtests (Deflated Sharpe), signed receipts.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (99/100 against 65). MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; Numguard runs on your own machine. MCP has noticeably more public adoption.

 MCPNumguard
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA99/100C65/100
AdoptionEstablishedNew
GitHub stars533–
Downloads / week29724
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools—35
Write actions—3
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-19—
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

MCP vs Emilia ProtocolMCP vs Agent-Native ChatMCP vs three.ws ProvenanceMCP vs Doc BridgeMCP vs ProjectmemAll AI and agents servers