Head to head
MCP vs HallucC — Hallucination & Safety Guardian
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Hallucination & safety checks for LLM/Agent outputs: claim-level fact-check with citations.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (99/100 against 87). MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | HallucC — Hallucination & Safety Guardian | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A99/100 | A87/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 533 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 297 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |