Head to head
decaframe vs Edgehound
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
decaframe
Bcom.decaframe/decaframeNo reviews yet
Presentations, slides, reports and one-pagers your agent designs and you edit. Exports to one file.
Full listingEdgehound
Aio.github.Energixe/edgehound-mcpNo reviews yet
Writes adversarial test suites for AI-built code. Your agent's test engineer.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Edgehound (97/100 against 74). Edgehound is hosted and callable through the gateway; decaframe runs on your own machine.
| decaframe | Edgehound | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B74/100 | A97/100 |
| Adoption | — | — |
| GitHub stars | – | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | — |
| Last release | — | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |