Head to head
Scrapling MCP Server vs Arcane RMCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Web scraping with stealth HTTP, real browsers, and Cloudflare bypass. CSS selectors supported.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Arcane Docker and Compose management over MCP and CLI with authenticated stdio and HTTP.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Scrapling MCP Server (92/100 against 65). Scrapling MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Scrapling MCP Server | Arcane RMCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Widely used | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 83k | 3 |
| Downloads / week | 212k | 32 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-09 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |