Head to head
Contentrain vs Scrapling MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Git-native content governance for AI agents — 27 deterministic MCP tools over stdio and HTTP.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Web scraping with stealth HTTP, real browsers, and Cloudflare bypass. CSS selectors supported.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (86 and 92 out of 100). Contentrain is hosted and callable through the gateway; Scrapling MCP Server runs on your own machine. Scrapling MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Contentrain | Scrapling MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | 4 | 83k |
| Downloads / week | 1.4k | 212k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |