Head to head
Pentest vs MCP Customs
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Offline methodology engine for authorized penetration testing, CTF, and security research.
Full listingMCP Customs
Cio.github.mcpcustoms/mcp-customsNo reviews yet
Inspect an MCP server for common security risks before you install it. Offline, zero telemetry.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (73 and 69 out of 100). Pentest is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP Customs runs on your own machine.
| Pentest | MCP Customs | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B73/100 | C69/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | 116 | 28 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 7 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | 2026-07-31 |
| Category | Security | Security |