Head to head
Cybersec Toolkit vs Pentest
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Authorization-gated MCP server to discover and run 670+ security tools for CTF, pentest, and DFIR.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Offline methodology engine for authorized penetration testing, CTF, and security research.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Cybersec Toolkit (88/100 against 73). Pentest is hosted and callable through the gateway; Cybersec Toolkit runs on your own machine.
| Cybersec Toolkit | Pentest | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | B73/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 57 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | 116 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 7 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Security | Security |