Mmcp.market

Head to head

Faostat vs PostgreSQL MCP Server

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Faostatio.github.cyanheads/faostat-mcp-server
A
No reviews yet

UN FAOSTAT global food & agriculture statistics over a local SQLite mirror, via MCP.

Full listing
PostgreSQL MCP Serverio.github.YawLabs/postgres-mcp
B
No reviews yet

PostgreSQL MCP server - query, schema introspection, explain, and health checks for AI assistants

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (86 and 83 out of 100). Faostat is hosted and callable through the gateway; PostgreSQL MCP Server runs on your own machine.

 FaostatPostgreSQL MCP Server
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA86/100B83/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars25
Downloads / week1803.2k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools621
Write actions13
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-19
CategoryDatabasesDatabases

Other comparisons

Faostat vs gadakFaostat vs Tactical RMM MCPFaostat vs DBHubFaostat vs Magic CloudFaostat vs MycAll Databases servers