Head to head
Faostat vs Magic Cloud
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
UN FAOSTAT global food & agriculture statistics over a local SQLite mirror, via MCP.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Generate secured CRUD APIs over your database, run SQL, manage files, tasks and a headless browser
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Magic Cloud (88/100 against 62). Faostat is hosted and callable through the gateway; Magic Cloud runs on your own machine.
| Faostat | Magic Cloud | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C62/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 1.2k |
| Downloads / week | 180 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 6 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |