Mmcp.market

Head to head

Faostat vs Atera MCP

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Faostatio.github.cyanheads/faostat-mcp-server
A
No reviews yet

UN FAOSTAT global food & agriculture statistics over a local SQLite mirror, via MCP.

Full listing
Atera MCPio.github.Servosity/atera-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Every Atera RMM + PSA endpoint, plus a local SQLite mirror that answers fleet-health, SLA, and

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Faostat (86/100 against 75). Faostat is hosted and callable through the gateway; Atera MCP runs on your own machine.

 FaostatAtera MCP
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA86/100B75/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars241
Downloads / week180–
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools6—
Write actions1—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0NOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-192026-09-18
CategoryDatabasesDatabases

Other comparisons

Faostat vs gadakFaostat vs Tactical RMM MCPFaostat vs DBHubFaostat vs Magic CloudFaostat vs MycAll Databases servers