Mmcp.market

Head to head

Clinicaltrialsgov vs Pacer

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Clinicaltrialsgovio.github.cyanheads/clinicaltrialsgov-mcp-server
A
No reviews yet

Search ClinicalTrials.gov — find studies, retrieve results, match patients to eligible trials.

Full listing
Pacerio.github.pipeworx-io/pacer
B
No reviews yet

PACER Case Locator (PCL) MCP — live US federal court case & party search on the

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Clinicaltrialsgov (93/100 against 77). Clinicaltrialsgov has noticeably more public adoption.

 ClinicaltrialsgovPacer
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA93/100B77/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars940
Downloads / week5.7k–
Runs whereHosted (remote)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyYesYes
Tools738
Write actions—4
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-182026-09-19
CategoryWeb searchWeb search

Other comparisons

Clinicaltrialsgov vs PyEuropePMCClinicaltrialsgov vs HasData Google ScholarClinicaltrialsgov vs LitescrapeClinicaltrialsgov vs AmassAll Web search servers