Head to head
mailwarden vs inbox-to-action
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Gmail MCP server for email triage: search, labels, archive, trash, unsubscribe, snooze.
Full listinginbox-to-action
?io.github.tarunlnmiit/inbox-to-actionNo reviews yet
Agentic Gmail triage: classify, summarize, extract tasks, draft replies. Never sends.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. mailwarden has noticeably more public adoption.
| mailwarden | inbox-to-action | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | ? |
| Adoption | Growing | — |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 529 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category |