Head to head
mailwarden vs webhook-inbox
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
mailwarden
Aio.github.csitte/mailwardenNo reviews yet
Gmail MCP server for email triage: search, labels, archive, trash, unsubscribe, snooze.
Full listingwebhook-inbox
Cco.kymac.inbox/webhook-inboxNo reviews yet
Ephemeral HTTPS inbox for bots: mint URL, capture POSTs, list JSON. TEST. https://inbox.kymac.co
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mailwarden (94/100 against 63). webhook-inbox is hosted and callable through the gateway; mailwarden runs on your own machine.
| mailwarden | webhook-inbox | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A94/100 | C63/100 |
| Adoption | — | — |
| GitHub stars | – | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 15 |
| Write actions | — | 10 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | — |
| Last release | — | — |
| Category |