Head to head
Connskill Growth vs MCP Junction
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local market checks, rankings and keyword research as JSON, paid per call via x402 in USDC on Base.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Search a nightly-refreshed directory of MCP servers by keyword, category or topic.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (83 and 89 out of 100). MCP Junction is hosted and callable through the gateway; Connskill Growth runs on your own machine.
| Connskill Growth | MCP Junction | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 201 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 5 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | SEO | SEO |