Head to head
Connskill Growth vs Citable
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local market checks, rankings and keyword research as JSON, paid per call via x402 in USDC on Base.
Full listing
No reviews yet
SEO and AI-visibility checks agents buy per call — USDC on Solana, no API key.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Connskill Growth (83/100 against 55). Connskill Growth has noticeably more public adoption.
| Connskill Growth | Citable | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | C55/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 201 | 56 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 19 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category | SEO | SEO |