Head to head
Audit vs Github Intel
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Score a public GitHub repo 0-100, or search Legit.Show for launched software by what we measured.
Full listingGithub Intel
Cio.github.mrfentmen/github-intel-mcpNo reviews yet
GitHub repository intelligence: search repos, read repo details, and list user repos. No key...
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Audit (89/100 against 65). Audit has noticeably more public adoption.
| Audit | Github Intel | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | — |
| GitHub stars | 1 | – |
| Downloads / week | 27 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 4 | 3 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-22 | — |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |