Head to head
Audit vs GitHub
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Score a public GitHub repo 0-100, or search Legit.Show for launched software by what we measured.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours GitHub (98/100 against 89). GitHub is hosted and callable through the gateway; Audit runs on your own machine. GitHub has noticeably more public adoption.
| Audit | GitHub | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 33k |
| Downloads / week | 27 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 4 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-22 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |