Head to head
Hookjar vs Mizuki
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Public webhook inboxes for agents. Receive OAuth redirects, payment callbacks and CI notifications.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Mizuki (77/100 against 62). Hookjar is hosted and callable through the gateway; Mizuki runs on your own machine. Mizuki has noticeably more public adoption.
| Hookjar | Mizuki | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C62/100 | B77/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 8 |
| Downloads / week | – | 29 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 13 |
| Write actions | — | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |