Head to head
Hookjar vs Audit
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Public webhook inboxes for agents. Receive OAuth redirects, payment callbacks and CI notifications.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Score a public GitHub repo 0-100, or search Legit.Show for launched software by what we measured.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Audit (89/100 against 62). Hookjar is hosted and callable through the gateway; Audit runs on your own machine. Audit has noticeably more public adoption.
| Hookjar | Audit | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C62/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | 27 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-22 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |