Mmcp.market

Head to head

KEVAREMESH Gateway vs Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

KEVAREMESH Gatewayio.github.cirralink-stack/kevaremesh-gateway
C
No reviews yet

One x402 tool: state your goal; KEVAREMESH selects, adapts, routes, and handles MCP payment.

Full listing
Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web toolsio.github.MikeyPetrillo/agent402
A
No reviews yet

Agentic Finance: 500+ agent tools, multi-chain USDC over x402 or MPP, free via PoW or card credits

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools (86/100 against 56). Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools has noticeably more public adoption.

 KEVAREMESH GatewayAgent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC56/100A86/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars8
Downloads / week499
Runs whereHosted (remote)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyYesYes
Tools115
Write actions2
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceAGPL-3.0
Last release2026-09-19
CategoryFinanceFinance

Other comparisons