Head to head
KEVAREMESH Gateway vs AgentIndex
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
KEVAREMESH Gateway
Cio.github.cirralink-stack/kevaremesh-gatewayNo reviews yet
One x402 tool: state your goal; KEVAREMESH selects, adapts, routes, and handles MCP payment.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours AgentIndex (87/100 against 56). AgentIndex has noticeably more public adoption.
| KEVAREMESH Gateway | AgentIndex | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C56/100 | A87/100 |
| Adoption | New | New |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 1 | 4 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | — |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-12 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |