Mmcp.market

Head to head

Cerebro vs Actual Budget MCP Server

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Cerebroio.github.Carlos-VLab/cerebro
C
No reviews yet

Pay-per-call ($0.25 USDC) project cost estimator: modules + cheapest model mix that clears quality.

Full listing
Actual Budget MCP Serverio.github.s-stefanov/actual-mcp
B
No reviews yet

MCP server exposing Actual Budget accounts, transactions, budgets and reporting to LLM assistants.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Actual Budget MCP Server (83/100 against 67). Cerebro is hosted and callable through the gateway; Actual Budget MCP Server runs on your own machine. Actual Budget MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.

 CerebroActual Budget MCP Server
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC67/100B83/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars–234
Downloads / week–867
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools148
Write actions—23
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Cerebro vs AuscaCerebro vs BridgeNode MCPCerebro vs MaginaryCerebro vs ContextStream MCP ServerCerebro vs ImageAll AI and agents servers