Head to head
Black Label Continuum Website MCP vs Clinicaltrialsgov
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search ClinicalTrials.gov — find studies, retrieve results, match patients to eligible trials.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Clinicaltrialsgov (93/100 against 69). Clinicaltrialsgov has noticeably more public adoption.
| Black Label Continuum Website MCP | Clinicaltrialsgov | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C69/100 | A93/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 94 |
| Downloads / week | – | 5.8k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 3 | 7 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |