Head to head
memory-arbiter-mcp vs Supabase
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
memory-arbiter-mcp
Bio.github.billy12151/memory-arbiter-mcpNo reviews yet
Local SQLite MCP memory: evidence-based recall, advisory conflict notices, authorized governance.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Supabase (82/100 against 71). Supabase is hosted and callable through the gateway; memory-arbiter-mcp runs on your own machine.
| memory-arbiter-mcp | Supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B71/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | — | — |
| GitHub stars | – | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | — |
| Last release | — | — |
| Category | Databases | Databases |