Mmcp.market

Head to head

Memory Arbiter vs Cost Guard MCP

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Memory Arbiterio.github.billy12151/memory-arbiter-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Local SQLite MCP memory: evidence-based recall, advisory conflict notices, authorized governance.

Full listing
Cost Guard MCPio.github.mcpsmiths/cost-guard-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Pre-flight query cost and result-size guardrails for AI agents on BigQuery, Snowflake, Databricks

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Memory Arbiter (92/100 against 82). Memory Arbiter has noticeably more public adoption.

 Memory ArbiterCost Guard MCP
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100B82/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars91
Downloads / week1.6k–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools44
Write actions—1
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-18
CategoryDatabasesDatabases

Other comparisons

Memory Arbiter vs skillmemMemory Arbiter vs MycMemory Arbiter vs KEPTA — Agent MemoryMemory Arbiter vs FacthouseMemory Arbiter vs DBHubAll Databases servers