Head to head
Groundcheck vs Cedulon
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Verify claims, resolve FIGI identity, extract claims, and sign x402 delivery receipts over MCP.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (91 and 89 out of 100). Groundcheck is hosted and callable through the gateway; Cedulon runs on your own machine.
| Groundcheck | Cedulon | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 37 | 136 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 5 | 5 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |