Mmcp.market

Head to head

Groundcheck vs MCP

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Groundcheckio.github.beepboop2025/groundcheck
A
No reviews yet

Verify claims, resolve FIGI identity, extract claims, and sign x402 delivery receipts over MCP.

Full listing
MCPai.clawfetch/mcp
C
No reviews yet

Web intelligence for AI agents: fetch, render, extract, research. x402 micropayments, no API keys.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Groundcheck (91/100 against 62). Groundcheck is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP runs on your own machine.

 GroundcheckMCP
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA91/100C62/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars00
Downloads / week3747
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools5—
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-182026-09-17
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

Groundcheck vs Nutrient DWS MCP ServerGroundcheck vs Dsh VerifyGroundcheck vs CedulonGroundcheck vs zipnative MCP — ZIP creation, inspection, secure extraction & verificationGroundcheck vs GeminaAll Scraping and browsing servers