Head to head
b/cited vs FlowSentry
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
b/cited
Bai.bcited/bcitedNo reviews yet
AEO tools: scan any URL for AI-citation readiness, read the public leaderboard and citation panel.
Full listingFlowSentry
Cio.github.vasilicasijarvis/flowsentryNo reviews yet
Security scanner for n8n workflows + live MCP Trust-Check. 18 rules, OWASP mapped. Paid x402 API.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours b/cited (76/100 against 67).
| b/cited | FlowSentry | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B76/100 | C67/100 |
| Adoption | — | — |
| GitHub stars | – | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 6 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | — |
| Last release | — | — |
| Category | Security | Security |