Head to head
b/cited vs Draugr
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
b/cited
Bai.bcited/bcitedNo reviews yet
AEO tools: scan any URL for AI-citation readiness, read the public leaderboard and citation panel.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Security scanning for AI agents: SAST, SCA, secrets, IaC, DAST, ranked by real risk.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Draugr (91/100 against 76). b/cited is hosted and callable through the gateway; Draugr runs on your own machine.
| b/cited | Draugr | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B76/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | — | — |
| GitHub stars | – | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 6 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | — |
| Last release | — | — |
| Category | Security | Security |