Mmcp.market

Head to head

Cejel vs genefoundry

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Cejelio.github.BargLabs/cejel
A
No reviews yet

Offline deterministic engineering-trust certificates for repositories, with no telemetry.

Full listing
genefoundryio.github.berntpopp/genefoundry
A
No reviews yet

MCP gateway federating 22 biomedical MCP servers behind one endpoint: gnomAD, ClinVar, HPO, VEP.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours genefoundry (97/100 against 85). genefoundry is hosted and callable through the gateway; Cejel runs on your own machine.

 Cejelgenefoundry
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA85/100A97/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars26
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceAGPL-3.0MIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-18
CategoryEverything elseEverything else

Other comparisons

Cejel vs Azure MCP ServerCejel vs Microsoft 365 MCP ServerCejel vs MemorixCejel vs mcp-grafanaCejel vs ARC-1All Everything else servers