Head to head
Echo Memory vs PostgreSQL MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Shared memory for AI agents, as a graph in your own Postgres. Writes never call an LLM.
Full listing
No reviews yet
PostgreSQL MCP server - query, schema introspection, explain, and health checks for AI assistants
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Echo Memory (92/100 against 83). Echo Memory is hosted and callable through the gateway; PostgreSQL MCP Server runs on your own machine. PostgreSQL MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Echo Memory | PostgreSQL MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 5 |
| Downloads / week | – | 3.2k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 21 |
| Write actions | — | 3 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |