Mmcp.market

Head to head

PostgreSQL vs Echo Memory

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

PostgreSQLio.github.antonorlov/mcp-postgres-server
B
No reviews yet

MCP server for PostgreSQL: local, Docker, RDS, Neon, Supabase, or behind an SSH bastion.

Full listing
Echo Memoryio.github.ayushcodes10/echo-mem
A
No reviews yet

Shared memory for AI agents, as a graph in your own Postgres. Writes never call an LLM.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Echo Memory (92/100 against 83). Echo Memory is hosted and callable through the gateway; PostgreSQL runs on your own machine. PostgreSQL has noticeably more public adoption.

 PostgreSQLEcho Memory
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100A92/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars222
Downloads / week2.9k–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITApache-2.0
Last release2026-09-162026-09-17
CategoryDatabasesDatabases

Other comparisons

PostgreSQL vs Dataset to Postgres, Supabase & MySQL (Database Push)PostgreSQL vs NeonPostgreSQL vs PostgreSQL MCP ServerPostgreSQL vs Postgres AIopsPostgreSQL vs SupabaseAll Databases servers