Head to head
Echo Memory vs Local Memory
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Shared memory for AI agents, as a graph in your own Postgres. Writes never call an LLM.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Persistent local AI memory. SQLite + FTS5 + vector search, knowledge graph. No cloud, no API keys.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 91 out of 100). Echo Memory is hosted and callable through the gateway; Local Memory runs on your own machine.
| Echo Memory | Local Memory | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 14 |
| Downloads / week | – | 67 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-21 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |