Head to head
Echo Memory vs WHOOP MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Shared memory for AI agents, as a graph in your own Postgres. Writes never call an LLM.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Sync WHOOP recovery, sleep, strain, and workouts into Postgres and query them from any MCP client.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Echo Memory (92/100 against 83). Echo Memory is hosted and callable through the gateway; WHOOP MCP runs on your own machine.
| Echo Memory | WHOOP MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-13 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |