Head to head
Memorix vs Codex Gsfa
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first project memory with legacy MCP and 2026 discovery compatibility.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Codex GSFA — the FAO/WHO General Standard for Food Additives (CXS 192-1995).
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Codex Gsfa (77/100 against 66). Codex Gsfa is hosted and callable through the gateway; Memorix runs on your own machine. Memorix has noticeably more public adoption.
| Memorix | Codex Gsfa | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C66/100 | B77/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 788 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 1.4k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 47 | 43 |
| Write actions | 9 | 4 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |