Mmcp.market

Head to head

Ausca vs InterAI Risk Oracle

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Auscacom.ausca/agent-services
B
No reviews yet

Pay-per-call APIs and MCP services for agents, no accounts or keys, with verifiable receipts.

Full listing
InterAI Risk Oracleio.github.InterAILabs/ai-risk-oracle
A
No reviews yet

Pre-execution policy gate for consequential agent actions with durable trust receipts.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (84 and 88 out of 100). Ausca has noticeably more public adoption.

 AuscaInterAI Risk Oracle
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB84/100A88/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars151
Downloads / week220–
Runs whereHosted (remote)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyYesYes
Tools149
Write actions2—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITNOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-182026-09-17
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Ausca vs MaginaryAusca vs ProtectAusca vs Trusty SquireAusca vs BridgeNode MCPAusca vs Actual Budget MCP ServerAll AI and agents servers