Head to head
Ausca vs Chainverdict
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Pay-per-call APIs and MCP services for agents, no accounts or keys, with verifiable receipts.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Pay-per-call x402 checks before an agent moves money: token safety, wallet risk, identifiers.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Ausca (84/100 against 75). Ausca has noticeably more public adoption.
| Ausca | Chainverdict | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B84/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 15 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 220 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 14 | 20 |
| Write actions | 2 | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-04 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |