Mmcp.market

Head to head

Gdharness vs LoopGrid MCP

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Gdharnessio.github.Aureliolo/gdharness
A
No reviews yet

A harness for driving a Godot 4 project from an agent: addons, runtime bridge, MCP server, CLI.

Full listing
LoopGrid MCPio.github.loopgridio/loopgrid-mcp
B
No reviews yet

MCP bridge for tamper-evident evidence around consequential AI and agent decisions.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (85 and 82 out of 100). Gdharness has noticeably more public adoption.

 GdharnessLoopGrid MCP
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA85/100B82/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars10
Downloads / week6.5k–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools—6
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITNOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-192026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Gdharness vs Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude CodeGdharness vs Ask CodexGdharness vs mcptoonGdharness vs ContextStream MCP ServerGdharness vs Google SurfAll AI and agents servers