Head to head
Atomic Mail vs Machine Inbox
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Programmable email inbox for AI agents — JMAP, PoW auth, stdio MCP server.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Task-scoped email inboxes for AI agents: read mail, extract verification codes, and reply.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Atomic Mail (93/100 against 60). Atomic Mail has noticeably more public adoption.
| Atomic Mail | Machine Inbox | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A93/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 261 | – |
| Downloads / week | 234 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 11 |
| Write actions | — | 4 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category |