Head to head
Cricket vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Live ball-by-ball cricket, prediction-market prices, and a win model fitted on 17,907 matches.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Cricket (91/100 against 83). Cricket is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP runs on your own machine. MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Cricket | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 32 |
| Downloads / week | – | 193 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 15 | 7 |
| Write actions | — | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-12 | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |