Head to head
Cricket vs Godot MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Live ball-by-ball cricket, prediction-market prices, and a win model fitted on 17,907 matches.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Agent-driven Godot playtesting: editor control, input injection, game-time stepping, live state.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (91 and 92 out of 100). Cricket is hosted and callable through the gateway; Godot MCP runs on your own machine. Godot MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Cricket | Godot MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 167 |
| Downloads / week | – | 679 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 15 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-12 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |