Head to head
Verdict QA vs GrowSurf
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read-only MCP server over Verdict QA state: verdicts, findings, flaky quarantine, history.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Build and manage GrowSurf referral and affiliate programs through AI assistants.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours GrowSurf (100/100 against 66). GrowSurf is hosted and callable through the gateway; Verdict QA runs on your own machine. GrowSurf has noticeably more public adoption.
| Verdict QA | GrowSurf | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C66/100 | A100/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 640 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |