Head to head
site-spec vs Grounded Aeo
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server: audit any website for SEO, accessibility, and AI-searchability, then auto-fix it.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Audit and fix a site for AI citation + SEO, verify it, then publish a v=AEO1 record.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours site-spec (85/100 against 57). Grounded Aeo is hosted and callable through the gateway; site-spec runs on your own machine. site-spec has noticeably more public adoption.
| site-spec | Grounded Aeo | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | C57/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 1 | – |
| Downloads / week | 28 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 4 | 15 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-11 | — |
| Category | SEO | SEO |